← Explore more
Pro-AIPerson

Beeple

Digital Artist

45years oldMillennialBorn June, 1981

The digital artist behind the $69 million Everydays NFT — known offstage as Mike Winkelmann — enthusiastically wields AI tools and dismisses the “cultural theft” charge as ridiculous, arguing human creativity is also remix.

  1. +3.2proHas published AI-made work
  2. +3.1proUses AI in their work
  3. +1.9pro4 pro-AI statements (forceful)

Weights, statement counts, the ×1.25 multiplier for having a stake in an AI-impacted field, and the formula’s smoothing are already baked in — the points add up to the score: Strongly Pro-AI · 8.2/10

In his words

Calling bullshit on a insanely powerful new tool that we have just STARTED to explore seems extremely premature and naïve. Just because YOU have not YET seen art that appeals to you with a new tool does not mean that art is impossible to make…
X, 2022
The idea that people have that [AI] is not making anything new is not true. I think you can definitely make new things with AI.
CCN, 2024

Biography

Beeple is the working name of Mike Winkelmann (born 1981), the Wisconsin graphic designer who posted a new digital artwork every single day from 2007 onward — and in March 2021 sold the first 5,000 of them, stitched into the NFT Everydays: The First 5000 Days, for $69.3 million at Christie’s, instantly becoming one of the most expensive works by a living artist.

Remix all the way down

When image generators arrived, Beeple folded them straight into the daily grind, posting Midjourney-assisted renders and defending the tools against the art community’s backlash. In a June 2022 post he called dismissing the technology “extremely premature and naïve,” and he has since argued that AI takes over tedious detail work, freeing him to think conceptually. Asked about the claim that AI art is cultural theft, he told CCN he thinks that is “ridiculous” — most creativity, he argues, is bits and pieces rearranged into new combinations, and even the best visionaries borrow and remix.

His stance is not uncritical boosterism: his satirical daily renders skewer tech billionaires and AI hype as often as they use the tools, and his Art Basel installations have poked at our machine-mediated future. But as a working digital artist with perhaps the largest audience of any, his verdict is unambiguous — the tool is powerful, the theft framing is wrong, and artists should explore rather than boycott.

Quote sources

Sources & further reading

Canonical record: https://battlelines.ai/topic/beeple

Where they stand in the war