Charles Stross
Science-Fiction Author
Hugo-winning science-fiction author (Accelerando, the Laundry Files) and veteran tech essayist who calls LLMs “autocomplete on steroids” optimized to bamboozle CEOs, and the AI boom a bubble corroding critical thinking.
In his words
LLMs are effectively optimized for bamboozling CEOs into mistaking them for intelligent activity, rather than autocomplete on steroids.
I completely discounted the profound social impact of LLMs (or so-called “AI”), not simply as a massive technology sector investment bubble and happy hunting ground for snake oil salesmen and grifters, but as a corrosive influence on population-level critical thinking.
I’m talking about the very old, very slow AIs we call corporations, of course.
Biography
Charles Stross (born 1964 in Leeds, based in Edinburgh) is one of Britain’s leading science-fiction writers — author of Accelerando, the Laundry Files series, and Saturn’s Children, and a three-time Hugo Award winner. A former pharmacist and programmer, he has spent decades writing about machine intelligence in fiction while puncturing it in essays on his long-running blog, Charlie’s Diary. He co-wrote the Singularity satire The Rapture of the Nerds with Cory Doctorow.
From slow AIs to snake oil
His famous 2017 Chaos Communication Congress keynote, published as “Dude, you broke the future!”, argued that the truly dangerous artificial intelligences already exist: corporations, “very old, very slow AIs” with non-human goals. When the LLM boom arrived he applied the same skepticism to the machines themselves. In a December 2025 post, “Barnum’s Law of CEOs,” he argued the top-down corporate push to adopt AI exploits a cognitive bias in executives: language models generate plausible-sounding arguments — exactly the currency of the C-suite — while studies showed the tools actually slowing developers down.
Now, today’s LLMs are not intelligent. But they’re very good at generating plausible-sounding arguments, because they’re language models.
In a May 2026 retrospective on his own failed predictions, Stross admitted the one he most regretted missing was LLMs — not as useful technology, but as an investment bubble, a grifter’s paradise, and a corrosive influence on critical thinking, with most people “unable to see past the ELIZA illusion.” He has also skewered the Singularity-and-superintelligence worldview of tech billionaires as a “techno-religion,” arguing they are trying to build the science fiction they grew up reading — including, awkwardly, his own.
Where they stand in the war
Who backs them up
Sources & further reading
Canonical record: https://battlelines.ai/topic/charles-stross








