← Explore more
NuancedPerson

Kate Darling

Robot Ethicist

44years oldMillennialBorn January, 1982

MIT Media Lab robot ethicist whose book “The New Breed” argues we should think of robots and AI as animal partners — supplements to human life, not replacements or rivals.

  1. 31%nuancedHolds a documented two-sided view
  2. 30%nuancedWorks on AI safety
  3. 25%antiCalls AI overhyped
  4. 8%pro1 pro-AI statement (measured)
  5. 6%anti1 anti-AI statement (mild)

Includes the ×1.25 multiplier for having a stake in an AI-impacted field. Evidence splits 8% pro, 31% anti, 61% direction-free → Nuanced

In her words

We completely overestimate the abilities of robots to do most human jobs.
InsideHook, 2021
Just like animals, robots don’t need to be a one-to-one replacement for our jobs or relationships. Instead, robots can enable us to work and love in new ways.
The New Breed, 2021 — quoted in Times Higher Education

Biography

Kate Darling is a research scientist at the MIT Media Lab and one of the world’s best-known scholars of human-robot interaction. Trained in law and economics before turning to robot ethics, she spent years running experiments on how readily people empathize with machines — including a famous workshop in which participants refused to “hurt” toy dinosaur robots — and held fellowships at Harvard’s Berkman Klein Center and the Yale Information Society Project.

The animal analogy

Her 2021 book “The New Breed: What Our History with Animals Reveals About Our Future with Robots” makes the argument she is now synonymous with: the endless comparison of robots and AI to humans is a trap. “Comparing robots to people is limiting,” she wrote — we have millennia of experience integrating a different kind of intelligence into our work, transport, armies and families: animals. Oxen did not replace farmers, and therapy dogs do not replace nurses; in her view robots, like animals, are partners with alien skill sets, not substitutes for people.

That framing makes her an optimist about the technology and a sharp critic of how humans deploy it. The real dangers, she argues, are not robot uprisings but human choices: programmers baking their biases into systems, and companies using automation as an excuse to degrade labor. As she put it in 2021, the conflict that matters is “humans versus humans” — and if we care about human flourishing, we should look past the robots to the systems and choices around them.

Quote sources

Sources & further reading

Canonical record: https://battlelines.ai/topic/kate-darling

Where they stand in the war