← Explore more
Pro-AIPerson

Robin Sloan

Novelist

Author of “Mr. Penumbra’s 24-Hour Bookstore” who was writing fiction with homebrew language models back in 2016 — and whose essays on whether AI training is ethically “okay” are among the most nuanced from any working novelist.

In his words

It’s like writing with a deranged but very well-read parrot on your shoulder.
robinsloan.com, 2016
The goal is not to make writing “easier”; it’s to make it harder. The goal is not to make the resulting text “better”; it’s to make it different — weirder, with effects maybe not available by other means.
robinsloan.com, 2016
If an AI application delivers some profound public good, or even if it might, it’s probably okay that its value is rooted in this unprecedented operationalization of the commons.
robinsloan.com, 2025

Biography

Robin Sloan (born 1979) is an American novelist whose debut, “Mr. Penumbra’s 24-Hour Bookstore” (2012), became a New York Times bestseller by treating Google-age technology and old books as co-conspirators rather than enemies. He followed it with “Sourdough” (2017) and “Moonbound” (2024), and writes an influential newsletter and lab blog from California.

Writing with the machine

Sloan started experimenting with neural-network prose in 2016 — years before ChatGPT — training recurrent networks and later GPT-2 on corpora of science fiction and invoking them mid-sentence in his text editor for suggested continuations. In his essay “Writing with the machine” he was explicit that he wanted augmentation, not automation: “I am absolutely 100% not talking about an editor that ‘writes for you’… The world doesn’t need any more dead-eyed robo-text.”

He has been equally clear that human novelists are not endangered, telling Publishers Weekly there is no shortage of good novels by humans and that readers would rather read something written by a person about a person’s existence in the world.

His February 2025 essay “Is it okay?” tackled the training-data question head-on, concluding that models trained on humanity’s common inheritance are “probably okay” when they deliver profound public goods — reasoning, science, code — and “probably not okay” when they simply replicate the creative work they consumed. Unlike blanket opponents such as the The Authors Guild, Sloan is willing to accept disruption as part of the bargain: “Fine, wreck the arts as we know them. We’ll invent new ones.”

Where they stand in the war

Sources & further reading

Canonical record: https://battlelines.ai/topic/robin-sloan