← Explore more
Anti-AIOrganization

AI Now Institute

AI Policy Research Institute

9years oldFounded 2017

The NYU-born policy institute, led by Amba Kak and Sarah Myers West, argues that AI is above all a concentration of Big Tech power — its annual landscape reports have shaped the antitrust-flavored critique of the AI industry.

  1. +4.6antiCampaigns against AI
  2. +1.2anti2 anti-AI statements (forceful)
  3. ±0nuancedWorks on AI safety
  4. ±0nuancedFears big tech will monopolize AI

Weights, statement counts, the ×1.5 multiplier because AI is their life’s work, and the formula’s smoothing are already baked in — the points add up to the score (direction-free evidence pulls toward the middle instead): Firmly Anti-AI · 5.8/10

In their words

AI is fundamentally about concentration of power in the hands of Big Tech.
AI Now Institute, Artificial Power report, 2025
We can’t fight tech oligarchy without rejecting the current industry trajectory around large scale AI.
AI Now Institute, Artificial Power report, 2025

Biography

The AI Now Institute was founded in 2017 at New York University by Kate Crawford and Meredith Whittaker to study the social implications of artificial intelligence — one of the first research centers built on the premise that AI’s problems are political and economic, not just technical. Now an independent policy institute co-directed by Amba Kak and Sarah Myers West, both former advisers to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, it has become the intellectual home of the anti-monopoly critique of AI.

The power critique

AI Now’s signature output is its landscape reports. The 2023 edition, “Confronting Tech Power,” argued that the generative-AI boom was consolidating control over data, compute, and talent in a handful of firms; the June 2025 follow-up, “Artificial Power,” declared that “AI is fundamentally about concentration of power in the hands of Big Tech” and questioned an industry of sky-high valuations without “profit-making use cases.” Its prescriptions run to bright-line antitrust rules, structural curbs on the largest firms, and support for worker organizing rather than the existential-risk framing favored by safety groups.

The institute’s fingerprints are on the FTC-era scrutiny of AI markets — its alumni staffed the agency under Lina Khan — and its arguments echo through congressional hearings, EU policy debates, and press coverage skeptical of the AI buildout. Critics counter that AI Now underweights the technology’s genuine utility and that its predictions of a profitless industry sit awkwardly beside AI’s spreading commercial adoption.

Distinct from doom-focused organizations, AI Now is less worried that AI will destroy humanity than that a few corporations will own it — a critique of who controls the technology rather than of the technology itself.

Quote sources

Sources & further reading

Canonical record: https://battlelines.ai/topic/ai-now-institute

Where they stand in the war