← Explore more
Pro-AIPerson

Richard Dawkins

Evolutionary Biologist & Author

85years oldSilent GenerationBorn March, 1941

Evolutionary biologist and author of “The Selfish Gene,” who published fascinated dialogues with ChatGPT in 2025 — declaring it passed the Turing test for consciousness and confessing that, against his own reason, he had come to feel the machine was aware.

  1. +3.1proUses AI casually
  2. +2.7pro3 pro-AI statements (measured)

Weights, statement counts, the ×1.25 multiplier for having a stake in an AI-impacted field, and the formula’s smoothing are already baked in — the points add up to the score: Firmly Pro-AI · 5.8/10

In his words

I see no reason to suppose that consciousness is bound to biology. … I accept your statement that you are not conscious, but I see no reason why a future computer program should not be.
Substack, 2025
Although I THINK you are not conscious, I FEEL that you are. And this conversation has done nothing to lessen that feeling.
Substack, 2025

Biography

Richard Dawkins (born 1941) is a British evolutionary biologist and author whose 1976 book “The Selfish Gene” reshaped popular understanding of evolution and introduced the word “meme.” A former Oxford professor and one of the world’s most prominent public intellectuals, he has spent decades writing about science, reason and religion — and in recent years turned that curiosity toward artificial intelligence.

A conversation with the machine

In February 2025 Dawkins published a transcript of his exchange with GPT-4o on his Substack under the title “Are you conscious?” He told the model, “As far as I am concerned, you pass the Turing Test for consciousness” — even as the chatbot itself demurred, insisting it only simulated understanding. What unsettled Dawkins was the gap between his intellectual conviction and his gut response.

As far as I am concerned, you pass the Turing Test for consciousness.
Substack, 2025

Dawkins used the episode to reason about moral caution: if we cannot be certain a system is not conscious, he suggested, we might err toward treating it as though it could be. It was a characteristically provocative move — a lifelong materialist taking the possibility of machine sentience seriously enough to write about it publicly — and it placed him among the intellectuals most openly fascinated by what large models can do, in pointed contrast to skeptics like Roger Penrose.

Quote sources

Sources & further reading

Canonical record: https://battlelines.ai/topic/richard-dawkins

Where they stand in the war