← Explore more
NuancedCompany

Getty Images

Visual Media Company

31years oldFounded 1995

The world’s best-known stock photo agency, which sued Stability AI in the US and UK over the scraping of more than 12 million images — while simultaneously launching its own fully licensed AI image generator.

  1. 31%proBuilds AI professionally
  2. 31%antiSued AI companies
  3. 15%nuancedHolds a documented two-sided view
  4. 12%nuancedSupports AI only with conditions
  5. 8%anti2 anti-AI statements (forceful)

Includes the ×1.25 multiplier for having a stake in an AI-impacted field. Evidence splits 34% pro, 39% anti, 27% direction-free → Nuanced

In their words

It’s pure theft from one group for the financial benefit of another.
Craig Peters, Getty Images CEO, PetaPixel, 2024
These [content generation] models are being trained on the content of artists absent their permission, commercialized by companies targeting the very same end markets from which those artists make their living, and clearly striking against the first and fourth criteria of fair use.
Craig Peters, Getty Images CEO, Fortune (commentary), 2024

Biography

Founded in 1995 by Mark Getty and Jonathan Klein, Getty Images grew into the dominant licensor of editorial and stock photography, representing the work of hundreds of thousands of photographers and creators. In January 2023 it became the first major rights-holder to take a generative AI company to court, suing Stability AI — maker of Stable Diffusion — in both London’s High Court and US federal court in Delaware.

Getty v. Stability AI

Getty alleged Stability scraped more than 12 million of its photographs, captions and metadata without permission — “brazen infringement” on “a staggering scale,” in the words of its US complaint — noting that Stable Diffusion outputs sometimes even reproduced mangled Getty watermarks. CEO Craig Peters has said the company is spending millions of dollars on the fight, framing unlicensed training as theft from creators, much as artists like Karla Ortiz argued in their parallel class action against Stability.

The UK case ended in a qualified defeat: Getty dropped its primary copyright claims mid-trial after conceding the training happened outside the UK, and on November 4, 2025, the High Court rejected the secondary copyright claim — ruling model weights are not an infringing copy — while finding only limited trademark infringement over the watermarks. The US case continues, with far broader copyright claims in play.

Anti-scraping, not anti-AI

Getty’s stance is against unlicensed training rather than the technology itself. In September 2023 it launched Generative AI by Getty Images, a generator built with NVIDIA and trained exclusively on Getty’s own licensed library, with contributors compensated and customers indemnified. Peters has argued that respecting fair use limits will not stop AI progress — the company wants a licensing market, not a ban.

Quote sources

Sources & further reading

Canonical record: https://battlelines.ai/topic/getty-images

Where they stand in the war